Posts Tagged ‘investors’

Underlying Facts Supporting Farmland Prices

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

I recently attended the annual Land Investment Expo in Des Moines, Iowa and listened to an interesting presentation by Jim Knuth, Senior Vice President of Farm Credit Services.   Because it has so many local lending offices, Farm Credit has the ability to collect and analyze an incredible amount of land sale data.  The discussion included some general information, e.g., land values in IA have increased 34% the past 12 months, along with some more obscure (though important) statistics, some of which may explain how we’ve arrived at these current price levels. To wit…

1. In 2006, there were 6207 real estate sales in the territory serviced by the Farm Credit Services of America district (IA, SD, WY, NE).  In 2011, the number dropped to 4434 sales, confirming that there is a lot less land available to buy.

2.  In 2009, the debt to asset ratio for district borrowers was 35%.  In 2011, the ratio actually dropped to 34% despite higher land prices.  In addition, the loan to collateral value over the same period dropped from 54% to 48%. This confirms that the balance sheets for farmers continue to improve.

3.  In 2008, farmers purchased 82% of the IA farms that closed.  This number dropped to 73% in 2011, thus indicating that investors are continuing to purchase land despite the higher prices.

4.  In 2009, 29% of the land sold at public auction while in 2011 this percentage increased to 50%.  Not coincidentally, most of the record sale prices have occurred at auction, as there are a number of aggressive buyers in the market looking to add to their land holdings.

I look at the underlying land issues listed above, and am more convinced that this rapid increase in farmland values has been driven by profits and not speculation.  At some point, prices will stabilize and there may be a period where the market experiences a short-term correction.  I just can’t buy into the “bubble is ready to burst at anytime” scenario that a few economists are still predicting.

Runaway Land Prices Rational?

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

As mentioned in a previous blog, last month the Chicago Federal Reserve Bank hosted a farm real estate conference.  This gathering was the culmination and presentation of a year’s worth of research by the FDIC, the Chicago Fed, the Farm Credit Administration, and various other regulators.  These agencies wanted to determine if the steep run-up in land prices really was a bubble ready to pop, as some have suggested, or simply the result of market forces at work. Their findings were neatly summarized in this article by Marcia Zarley Taylor, Runaway Land Prices Rational, Regulators Now Say, originally published on the DTN website, and then republished on the KFGO radio website – www.kfgo.com.

In a nutshell, the experts confirmed what many of us have been saying for quite some time – current land values are not a function of speculators manipulating the market in hopes of making a quick profit, or buyers taking on excessive risk by heavily leveraging their purchases (a.k.a. the U.S. housing market).  Instead, values have been driven to their lofty heights by a combination of record net farm income and record low interest rates.  Yes, profits and cash flow have been the catalysts for higher land prices… a stark contrast from the market 30 years ago.

Since the fall of 2006, when the demand for land really began to pick up, one group I think that has been under-appreciated, yet a true stabilizing force in the market, is the ag bankers.  They have kept a close eye on the farm financial situation and provided the necessary capital for farmers/investors to complete land purchases, but only when these borrowers had enough of a down payment so that the risk was minimized.  Hopefully, they’ll continue to keep their lending standards high in the future and act as the brake to slow any reckless behavior.  Now, can you tell me more about that 78 acres that sold in NW Iowa last week for $20,000 per acre?

More Analysis of the Farmland Market

Friday, November 25th, 2011

On November 15th, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago hosted a conference entitled “Rising Farmland Values – Causes and Cautions”.  A series of prominent economists, professors, lenders, and other industry professionals were invited to offer their view of the current state of the farmland marketplace in the Midwest.  Many of the  presentations can be found and downloaded here (Chicago Fed Ag Conference) by clicking on the “Agenda” tab.

I’m the first to admit that there are several different methods for discussing and analyzing the land value issue. Some experts have taken reams of historical data and neatly summarized the whole story in a series of charts and graphs.  Others have taken the more simplified approach of simply talking with land buyers and land sellers to see what’s been motivating their behavior.  When looking at the issue from this angle, it appears the biggest driver in ag land values has been the increase in farm income.  No doubt there are other forces at play, e.g., the risk/return of alternative investments, etc., but it still boils down to the fact that farmers have been making more money and they’ve invested a large part of their profits into new land purchases (or higher rents, thus stabilizing the returns to investors).

The future direction of land values is uncertain (though I personally feel that the rapid increase we’ve seen the past 5 years is going to level off) and I encourage all farmers and investors to continue reading and studying the issue closely.  But when you get to the point when your head is ready to explode from information overload, just remember the basics – if farmers are making money, land values will remain steady and/or move higher.  When they aren’t, especially for an extended period of time, then it’s time to get worried.

Pension Funds Still Heavily Invested in Farmland

Friday, October 21st, 2011

Pension funds investing in farmland is not a new trend.  They have long valued the steady income and long-term appreciation of the asset.  However, with farmland’s recent explosion into the mainstream as a “hot” investment, people have taken notice how heavily invested into agriculture pension and hedge funds really are.  A recent article posted on Financial Times (The Real Bull Market) takes a closer look at what is fueling the interest of these investors.  The main point that the article makes is that as world population grows, someone is going to have to grow the crops to feed the world.  Considering that US contains some of the productive and fertile land in the world, it stands to reason that investors would take long-term positions in US farmland.

This is not a new opinion.  We’ve seen numerous forecasters predicting that over the next 50 +/- years farmland would continue to be viewed a a desirable asset as the demand for food increases.  If it’s one thing that history has taught us, though, it is that nothing is a given.  For the short-term, meaning the next 12-18 months, farmland continues to appear to be a strong market.  However, the variables that help play into farm prices (commodities prices, interest rates, weather patterns, etc.) can change at any time and slow this market down considerably.  The buyers that are taking long positions, such as pension funds, have less risk than the buyers who are looking to buy a farm and flip it for a quick profit.  There are owners of vacant condos in Miami and Las Vegas than can tell you that the quick buck in real estate is sometimes easier said than done.

Suburban Land Owners Returning to Their Roots?

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

Ten years ago, when residential and commercial building projects were moving at break-neck speed, it was quite common for landowners with properties “in the path of development” to be offered incredible prices for their farms – $30,000, $40,000, $75,000 per acre.  Though some owners were reluctant to sell (most farmers buy land for future generations, not sell what they already own), many eventually chose to seize the opportunity and sold out… sort of.  What they essentially did was use the sale proceeds to reinvest in farmland in rural areas via a 1031 tax-deferred exchange (a method of deferring capital gain taxes).  Depending on the type of land they were trading into, in many cases they were buying five to ten acres for every one they were selling. The 1031 buyer was a major player driving ag land prices during the early part of the last decade and, in fact, many ag organizations were so concerned that they tried to develop strategies to limit their rights.

Fast forward to 2011.  With development in most parts of the Midwest at a virtual standstill, the development premium many builders were paying for farms has disappeared (along with many of the builders themselves).  Land prices in the path of progress are now back to levels supported by what the farm can produce from growing corn, not growing houses.  And in an interesting twist, the 1031 buyers of 10 years ago are now selling (at record prices) what they bought previously and are reinvesting the proceeds back home where they started.   As one such person recently quipped – “we’re buying land back in our home area with the idea of repeating the process in another 10 – 20 years, or when the economy has fully recovered and building is again at a frenzy”.

Everyone who invests in real estate knows that location is an important determinant of value, but many overlook how important timing can also be.  When you have both of those factors working in your favor, then the resulting profits can be staggering.