Future Effects of Commodities Supply & Demand

June 14th, 2013

A recent webinar produced by Purdue University addressed the topic of supply-demand balances for corn & beans and how that balance will affect the agriculture community.  (Note: A video to the full webinar has been embedded below and the presentation slide can be found here).  The two hosts, Professors Mike Boehlje & Chris Hurt, discuss a number of topics relating to supply and demand  of corn and beans.  Their view – the tremendous growth that we have seen in Ethanol and exports will slow and flatten.  They don’t predict a collapse, but a slowing of what we have been seeing.  With regards to exports, a slowing of income growth in China as well as other counties (especially those in South America) will play the main role in the slowed growth.  Regarding the supply side of commodities, with the slow planting season this spring (and now summer) the ending supply stocks don’t appear to be gaining much ground over where we ended 2012 at.  Boehlje & Hurt stated that both corn and beans appear to be in a holding pattern, which should keep commodity prices propped up for the near-term.

How will the fluctuations in supply & demand affect land prices?  Similar to the demand for corn & beans, the webinar hosts don’t see a major collapse on the horizon.  What they do think is possible is more of a “flattening out” of demand for farmland.  If, as mentioned above, growth in demand for commodities does slow down, the result will more than likely be a similar slow down in commodity prices.  Another factor that Boehlje & Hurt mention are interest rates.  Will they continue their rise?  If so, that will also affect what a buyer can afford to spend on farmland.  That being said, neither were confident in predicting a large decrease in farmland prices in the short-term.

Non-Land Costs Continue to Rise for Farmers

June 5th, 2013

A recent article on the University of Illinois FarmDoc Daily’s blog discusses the increasing non-land costs to farmers (Non-land costs continue to increase).  (Note: non-land costs would be all input costs for the operator such as fertilizer seed, fuel, etc.  They exclude rent payments, mortgage payments, etc.)  Author Gary Schnitkey takes a look back at the data collected in 2012, as well as previous years.  The results are that in 2012 farmers saw their per acre costs for corn increase by 13%.  Soybeans went up slightly more, with a 14% increase in costs.  Schnitkey points out that this upward moving trend has been occurring for a number of years.  According to the data in the article, non-land costs for corn more than doubled since 2005 ($287 per acre in 2005 compared to $581 in 2012) and per acre costs for beans almost doubled up as well ($187 per acre in 2005 compared to $353 per acre in 2012).

If commodity prices decrease, then some of the per acre costs could decrease as well.  Fertilizer prices could come down and/or farmers could try to get by with less fertilizer applications.  Also, with less income, farmers would more than likely have less capital expenditures (machinery, grain bins, sheds. etc.).  This would also apply to farmland.  If commodity prices slide, look for farmers to have less money to spend at a farm sale.

Western Ohio Farmland Values Projected to Continue to Climb

May 31st, 2013

A study recently released by Ohio State University (Western Ohio Cropland Values and Cash Rents 2012-2013) predicts continued growth in farmland values and rents in western Ohio counties through the end of the year.  The study included data taken from lenders, appraisers, farmers, landowners,etc.  Because of the differences in land use and productivity across the state of Ohio, many researchers often look more at the western half of the state since that is where the more productive farmland is found.

The study shows that the top performing land in western Ohio is expected to increase by 8.3% this year.  Rents for this type of land is expected to average $283 per acre, an increase of 9.5% over 2012.  Prices in the average producing farmland class are are expected to increase by  8.5% in 2013.  Land rents are expected to increase by 8.4% to $125 per acre.  Poor performing land is expected to increase by 11.7%and cash rents are expected to increase by nearly 8% to $156 per acre.

Demand remains strong and the supply of available farmland still remains low in relation to demand.  It will be interesting to keep on eye on how accurate the predictions end up being.  Last year, crop prices were propped up by the drought and correspondingly poor yields.  Due to he high crop prices, buyers remained aggressive and prices stayed strong. Most predicted/expected 2013 yields to make up a lot shortage of the 2012 yield shortage, causing a dip in crop prices.  At this point, however, with no end in sight of rain, we may end up seeing yields again affected and prices staying strong through the end of the year.  If so, farm prices will remain strong.

Iowa Cash Rents

May 22nd, 2013

Iowa State University recently published the findings of a survey that focused on farm rental rates in that state (Cash Rental Rates For Iowa 2013 Survey). In order to improve the accuracy of their results, they questioned several groups with a vested interest in the outcome, including farmers, farm managers, landowners, and other agri-business professionals. The report is quite comprehensive, as the information has been sub-divided and presented by region, by soil quality, and by crop type.

Like most similar surveys, the results reflect an average of the responses received. Further, those questioned were asked to only include information for the typical lease, not the outliers on the high or the low side. That doesn’t mean the numbers aren’t useful, it just means that a landowner shouldn’t automatically assume that their parcel ought to be renting for a similar amount. Differing circumstances from farm-to-farm, including the small size or unusual shape of the fields; the presence of terraces or creeks that affect the time it takes to plant and harvest the crops; high or low fertility levels or pH index levels; or above average local grain prices due to proximity to biofuel plants or feed mills, can all have a significant impact on the fairness of the final rent.

Even if your farm isn’t in Iowa, you can still learn something from the report. The general trends in rent over time and the adjustments that are being made in the marketplace for yields, soil types, and other variables are likely being mirrored in other parts of the Midwest. As we’ve discussed on numerous occasions in the past, having good information that you can use when negotiating a lease can give you leverage in the renewal process. Make sure that you’re keeping abreast of changes in the countryside so you can be certain that you’re receiving (or paying) a fair amount.

A Delta Expert’s View of the Farmland Market

May 9th, 2013

The Mississippi Land Bank recently held their annual meeting and the President of this organization, Abbott Myers, offered his outlook on land prices. For perspective, the Land Bank has been providing the financing and refinancing solutions for families, individuals and groups who want to purchase rural land and need to finance that purchase for over 90 years. During this time period, they’ve seen the best of times in agriculture, the worst of times, and everything in-between.

As reported in the on-line version of the Delta Farm Press (Farm Land Prices: A correction maybe, not a bursting bubble), Mr. Myers believes that over time land prices will correct themselves – in times when they appear to be too low, ultimately they begin to rise; and in times when they appear to be too high (as many believe they are now), they will correct to a level that can sustained by the underlying profits that the land can generate.

Mr. Myers further cited three variables that he believes will have the greatest impact on land values in the near term:

Commodity Prices. This is the one area where farmers, and the entire agriculture industry, have the least amount of control as the weather will dictate whether the crop size will be smaller than expected (as we saw last year) or larger. As has happened in the past, when we produce too much grain, commodity prices go down, along with profitability.

Interest Rates: The Federal Reserve has signaled that they desire to keep interest rates low through 2015. This not only helps the farmers trying to borrow money, but it also attracts outside money to farmland. These investors are looking for a hard asset with a reasonable annual return, and currently the alternative assets that they would normally invest in just aren’t generating the returns they want.

Government Farm Program: The lack of a new Farm Bill creates some uncertainty for the future. No one anticipates any major changes, though a major shift from direct payments to risk management (a.k.a. crop insurance) is likely. Many lenders prefer the insurance alternative as a way to minimize operating loan risk. However, the costs have to continue to be reasonable or the perceived benefit will not match the expense. Yes, farmers will remember the reduced yields from the drought of 2012, but they’ll also remember that major droughts only occur about every 25 years.

I think that Myers summed it up best with the following thought “the buyers of land the past couple of years have either paid cash, or paid down a significant amount of cash – they’re not borrowing a lot of money for these purchases. I think this is going to help keep prices from falling the way they did in the 1980’s. There may be a correction in farm land prices, but I don’t think it will be a bursting bubble.”