Posts Tagged ‘Real Estate’

Where Are The Farms?

Friday, February 25th, 2011

We have seen a tremendous amount of interest over the last 100 days from farmland buyers.  They are coming from many diverse buying groups – farmers, investors (both local and outsiders) and institutional buyers (i.e. pension funds).  We have received numerous calls from many buyers in all of these groups that are very actively looking to add farmland to their holdings.  Many factors have contributed to the current strength of the farmland real estate market, including a low supply.  As we learned in Econ 101, when demand is high and supply is low, the price will increase.

Back in 2007 and early 2008 we saw a similar increase in farmland values which was similarly fueled by high prices in the commodities markets.  We we saw many sellers trying to “time” the market and sell at what they perceived as the peak.  In some areas they were right, because as corn and bean prices fell, so did the demand for farmland and sale prices followed suit.  A lot of landowners who were considering selling during that time period, but didn’t, put their selling intentions on hold to wait for the market to gain more strength.  Well, with some of the recent sales we have seen around the Midwest (sales above $9,000 and $10,000 per acre for “A” farms and above $7,000 for “B/C” farms), it seems that the strength is back.  Will these buyers who have been sitting on the sidelines decide that now is the time to jump back into the market?  The demand is certainly there, but it is anyone ’s guess how long the current market we are in will last.

Farmland and the Rich

Friday, February 4th, 2011

Over the past few years, we’ve had the opportunity to work, i.e., buy or sell land, for some very wealthy families.  While they certainly have deeper pockets than most, these people are drawn to farmland for the same reasons the average farmer or investor might be – they believe that land is an excellent long-term investment.  They have no interest in farming the land themselves and are willing to make the capital improvements necessary to ensure that the property will be productive for future generations.  In sum, they simply want to be good long term stewards of the farms they buy.

Along these lines, a recent article in The Land Report (100 Largest USA LandOwners) provided an overview of some of the largest private property owners in this country that I found interesting.  While some of the names are quite well known (e.g. Ted Turner), there were many that I had never heard of… reinforcing the fact that they don’t own land for the publicity, instead they own it for its investment value.  It is also important to note that most of these properties consist primarily of either timberland or ranchland, and not Midwestern corn and soybean farms. Back in the mid to late 1800’s, however (before the mold board plow and tile drainage were in widespread use), the prairie areas in Illinois and Iowa were very inexpensive and some speculators did buy large blocks of land.  Over time though, these holdings were divided and sold and very few remnants remain.

So could an individual become a land baron in the Corn Belt today?  Personally, I don’t think so – some states limit the number of acres that an outsider can own, and  land ownership is so fragmented that it would be too difficult to assemble the acreage needed to be a major market player.   And from my experiences, the rich aren’t looking to corner the Midwestern land market, they just want to own a little piece of it.

A Closer Look At How Farm Purchases Are Being Made

Friday, November 19th, 2010

With many farmers taking advantage of higher commodities this fall, they have also been very active in adding to their operations, whether it be new farm equipment, a new pickup truck, or additional acreage.   What is interesting, however, is that instead of heading down to the local bank to finance their new purchases, many of these buyers are paying in cash.  A recent article posted on Agrimoney.com (Farmer’s Upturn Leaves Bankers Feeling The Pinch) reveals that instead of taking out loans to make capital improvements, many farmers are saving their money, taking advantage of high grain prices, and cutting the lender out altogether.  We have seen this trend occur less in the farm real estate industry simply because of the large amount of overall dollars that is typically involved.  That being said, farmers who are still financing land purchases can still take advantage of having more readily-available cash.  By putting more cash down, farmers can shorten the loan term and receive a lower interest rate.

The article also points out that, according to an index published by Creighton University, the amount of investment in farm equipment by farmers has been at its highest point since 2008.  From the activity that we have seen so far this fall in the farmland real estate market, this does not surprise me at all.  At our auctions this fall, the level of interest and participation by local purchasers has not been this strong since mid-2008 when farmers were pushing the market.  Some of the strong sales results that we have heard from around the state confirm this as well.

A Land Market Lesson

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

Many would argue that farmland in today’s market is relatively expensive.  I’m sure you’ve read or heard about various sales that have surprised you by the strength in their sale price.  On a recent message board, there was much discussion about how how “crazy” it is to see $8000/acre land prices in places. 

But $8000/acre farmland pales in comparison to what has occurred in the marketplace in the collar counties around Chicago.  A recent article, As the housing boom dies out, land prices drop, by Cindy Wojdyla Cain in the Plainfield Sun, describes the current state of affairs for the land market in and around the village of Plainfield, Illinois, one of the southwest suburbs of Chicagoland – and previously one of the fastest growing areas in the United States.  To sum up the article, let me just say that land values can go down – a lot. 

The impact of the severe drop in land values in that area is far reaching.  Many developers have gone bankrupt – jobs gone.  Many banks that financed the planned developments are becoming owners of property they really never wanted – and are struggling to find new buyers.  The local municipalities are also hurting financially, as they’d become accustomed to the generous revenue streams that the previous go-go days of development had provided.  And I haven’t even mentioned the impact on the local homeowners of that area, who have seen property values suffer in the well-publicized economic downturn.  Some would say that those who are suffering deserve it.  In an ironic twist, the article also discusses some of those who are benefitting from the mess, including many local farmers who’d previously sold their land for development, but who are now buying back tillable parcels for pennies (or dimes) on the dollar.

Personally, I believe this is an economic cycle that every economy – local, regional, national, global – will go through.  This is a “cleansing” of the marketplace, of sorts, that happens from time to time.  Is this downturn larger and more painful than most?  Without a doubt.  And I personally hate to see anyone suffer – economically or otherwise.  But this situation can teach us lessons.

  • Every market can go down – stocks, bonds, condominiums, and yes, rural farmland.  It seems like history always repeats itself, just in slightly different ways.  The turmoil around Plainfield reminds many observers of a microcosm of what happened to too many folks in the farm community during the 1970’s and 1980’s.  So use others mistakes and recognize what can happen in the rural land market.

 

  • You’ve heard this one – never bite off more than you can chew.  Leverage can be a great thing when it’s working for you – but it can provide equally painful results when it works against you.  And I’ve never heard of a foreclosure happening to someone who doesn’t borrow money.

 

  • Timing is everything.  You’ve heard about the 3 most important things in real estate – location, location, location.  But a close runner-up is to location is timing.  Some very smart and savvy people have been financially destroyed by bad timing.  Keep that in mind in your business.

 

  • Decisions have consequences.  I concede it may be somewhat hard to see the validity of this point when we consider the state of our “bailout nation”.  But when the politicians eventually get out of the way, the market will again get back to proper functioning – with the reality that all decisions have consequences.

 

The darkest situations for some often offer the best opportunities for others.  And if you’ve been damaged in some way by this economic downturn, always remember that failure is not permanent.  Just make sure you don’t miss out on the chance to learn from your mistakes, and the mistakes of others.

A COMMENT ON AGRICULTURAL INTEREST RATES

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

If you’ve recently borrowed money to buy a home, you know that interest rates remain near all-time historic lows (e.g., 5% for a 30-year mortgage!).  Some people not involved in the agricultural sector may also assume that ag lending rates are at or near those same remarkably cheap levels.  However, the facts show that this is not the case at the current time.

DTN Progressive Farmer recently published a snapshot of agricultural lending rates, provided to them by Farm Credit Services of Mid-America.  To see the report of recent interest rates charged for both real estate and operating capital, click here.

As you will see, long-term (e.g., 10+ years) money borrowed for an agricultural real estate mortgage has recently been more than 30% more expensive than that for a conventional home mortgage.  Why?  The answer stems from our government’s support for and purchase of more than a trillion dollars in housing-related mortgage backed securities during 2009 and into 2010 (to read more about the Fed’s actions, click here).  The financial support given to support the troubled housing market does not appear to be prevalent in the ag sector.

That said, ag sector lending rates – just like those for home mortgages – do remain near historic lows.  However, that may change.  In summation of a conversation I recently had with an ag lender, “rates only have one way to go, and that is up.”  And as the Federal Reserve attempts to feather its way out of providing tremendous support for the U.S. housing market in the next year and beyond, it will be interesting to watch the spread differences between home rates and those for ag loans.

What’s your opinion – should the government continue to support the U.S. housing market?  If so, is the ag sector being short-changed?  Send me an e-mail at doug@loranda.com to let me know your thoughts.