Posts Tagged ‘midwest’

Land Values Continue To Rise

Friday, March 25th, 2011

We recently had the opportunity to attend the Illinois Land Values Conference in Bloomington where participants discussed the last 12 months of trends in farmland values and leases.  Needless to say, with some of the sales that have been occurring lately, there was plenty to talk about!  According to the research, good-quality Central Illinois farmland increased 22% since last year’s report.  Keep in mind that that doesn’t include some of the more recent sales data that we have seen over the last 4-6 weeks.  In some areas, there have been reports of sales being 25 – 35% higher than a year ago.  In Southern Illinois, prices of good-quality farmland have risen by as much as 33% and in Northern Illinois as much as 18%.

What is driving the market right now?  The conclusions reached at the Land Values Conference are similar to what we have seen: 1) Farmers will be able to sell their grain at a high price this fall and are penciling in strong profits.  In our experience, farmers typically reinvest their profits back into their operation (i.e., buy more farm ground), as opposed to stocks, bonds, etc.  2) Interest rates remain relatively low and financing is readily available to farmland buyers who need it.  3) Investors, both individual and larger institutional buyers, view farmland as a stable investment that they can use to diversify their portfolios and receive a steady annual income off of.

So what is farmland worth in today’s market?  It is a bit of a moving target, but the simple answer is, “More than it was a year ago”.  In a recent DTN-Progressive Farmer article (Land Prices Soar in Seller’s Market), 1st Farm Credit Services appraiser Charles Knudson is quoted as saying he is appraising farmland at 4% monthly gains at the moment in his area.  It is important to remember that the overall farmland market is still very much a group of localized smaller markets.  A farm that sells for $10,000 per acre may only be a few miles from a farm that sells for $8,000 per acre…and both farms may have been sold for their maximum value.  While location is one of the biggest factors in determining the value of a piece of property, it is not the only one.  Do your homework on recent sales and see how they stack up to yours in terms of soil quality, drainage, fertility, access, eye-appeal, etc.

Farmland and the Rich

Friday, February 4th, 2011

Over the past few years, we’ve had the opportunity to work, i.e., buy or sell land, for some very wealthy families.  While they certainly have deeper pockets than most, these people are drawn to farmland for the same reasons the average farmer or investor might be – they believe that land is an excellent long-term investment.  They have no interest in farming the land themselves and are willing to make the capital improvements necessary to ensure that the property will be productive for future generations.  In sum, they simply want to be good long term stewards of the farms they buy.

Along these lines, a recent article in The Land Report (100 Largest USA LandOwners) provided an overview of some of the largest private property owners in this country that I found interesting.  While some of the names are quite well known (e.g. Ted Turner), there were many that I had never heard of… reinforcing the fact that they don’t own land for the publicity, instead they own it for its investment value.  It is also important to note that most of these properties consist primarily of either timberland or ranchland, and not Midwestern corn and soybean farms. Back in the mid to late 1800’s, however (before the mold board plow and tile drainage were in widespread use), the prairie areas in Illinois and Iowa were very inexpensive and some speculators did buy large blocks of land.  Over time though, these holdings were divided and sold and very few remnants remain.

So could an individual become a land baron in the Corn Belt today?  Personally, I don’t think so – some states limit the number of acres that an outsider can own, and  land ownership is so fragmented that it would be too difficult to assemble the acreage needed to be a major market player.   And from my experiences, the rich aren’t looking to corner the Midwestern land market, they just want to own a little piece of it.

Can the Small Investor Buy Farmland?

Thursday, January 20th, 2011

With farmland being such a popular investment in today’s market, I am now receiving at least one call a week from the person who only wants to invest a small amount of capital in land, perhaps $50 – $100 K.  As I explain to them, trying to purchase a farm outright with this amount of capital is nearly impossible at the present.  Why? – the typical Midwestern farm is at least 40 – 80 acres in size and the higher per acre prices means that a buyer needs a lot more money in order to play the game. Obviously disappointed, the caller’s follow-up question is a reasonable one… can you direct me toward any real estate investment trust (REIT), stock, or other investment vehicle that focuses solely on farmland? 

Unfortunately, this market really hasn’t developed yet and I’m not exactly sure why. Some likely reasons may include:  A. the annual returns aren’t high enough; B. the properties wouldn’t be liquid enough if several people wanted to cash out at the same time;  C. the paperwork and disclosures that the S.E.C. require would be cumbersome;  or D. perhaps it’s too difficult to acquire the assets needed to make it cost efficient.  Regardless, I personally haven’t had experience with any REIT or fund with a significant track record.  But, since farmland does seem to be the investment du jour, I do think there will be more firms trying to set something up for investors and at the bottom of this blog, I have included two links to some recent articles that discuss farmland REITs and other options.  

In summary, I think there will be alternatives in the future for the small investor wanting to invest in land, albeit indirectly.  After all, if there is a demand for something in this country, someone will ultimately supply it.

 First Publicly Traded Farmland Fund to Be Launched

 Farmland Investing Is Here to Stay

The 2012 Farm Bill

Monday, December 13th, 2010

Though it still seems a long way off, discussions on the new farm bill are already under way.  Jennifer Stewart and Roman Keeney at Purdue University recently wrote an interesting article that highlights what the major issues/discussions/arguments might be: (Watch Three B’s in the 2012 Farm Bill).  

The first “B” is Brazil.  In 2009, the World Trade Organization (W.T.O.) allowed Brazil to impose sanctions against the U.S. arguing that American cotton subsidies were illegal under W.T.O. rules.  Changes must be made in the 2012 farm bill so that the U.S. is in compliance with global trade rules.  While the total dollars involved may not be significant, the principle issue will be as changes may have to be made to other program crops in order to avoid possible sanctions later.

The second “B” is the federal Budget.  As the elections in November reflected, people in this country are tired of government overspending.  The campaign theme of many of the newly elected senators and representatives was reducing the federal deficit and all programs are potentially on the chopping block. And since the farm part of the U.S. economy has been one of the few profitable sectors the past several months, many politicians will be taking a hard look at the programs closely related to agriculture.

The final “B” is baseline spending. Though a part of the overall budget process, this concept would hopefully allow the farm bill to move quickly through the house without being subjected to larger reform budget procedures.  The goal is to hold spending in the new bill close to previous levels, thus avoiding an extended discussion on the costs and benefits of each the programs.  Unfortunately, this may be much more difficult to achieve than is hoped.

Yes, it does seem like only yesterday when Midwestern farmers were trying to understand the nuances of the ACRE program passed in the last farm bill.  One can only imagine what surprises Congress may have in store for the next go-around as the give-and-take world of politics will likely determine the final outcome.

An Interesting Start to the Harvest Season

Friday, September 17th, 2010

We’ve had the opportunity to talk with several farmers across the Midwest recently about 2010 crop yields.  The comments regarding corn have been fairly consistent – A. The crop is much drier than in 2009; B. Excessive rains during the growing season created many nitrogen deficient areas; and, C. Excessive heat in August reduced kernal size.  In summary, the yields are O.K… but less than expected (and less than the past 3 years). 

The U.S.D.A. finally recognized these conditions in their September 10 crop report.  A good summary of this information can be found on the University of Illinois “farmdoc” website (QUESTIONS REMAIN FOR CORN AND SOYBEAN MARKETS).  More importantly, the grain markets have recognized these conditions and corn futures are now over $5.00 per bushel.

Reports of soybeans yields are mixed.  I’ve heard 70 bushel yields from some farmers and 35 bushel yields from others.  SDS has pounded yields in some areas, even on the best soils.  Soybean futures are still over $10 per bushel, but longer term prices of this  more ”globally grown” commodity are greatly affected by crop conditions in other parts of the world.

So how will all this affect land values?  I think  higher corn prices will encourage farmers and investors to be active buyers this fall.  They will still be somewhat selective in their purchases but historically higher commodity prices have always boosted the optimism in the countryside.  And I think this fall will be no different.