Posts Tagged ‘investors’

Foreign Ownership of Midwestern Farmland

Friday, March 2nd, 2012

It’s no longer a secret that Midwestern farmland has been one of the best performing assets the past few years – farmers and investors alike have flocked to it for both its annual stream of income and its appreciation in value.  As an offshoot of its widespread popularity, land is now attracting the attention of many foreign investors.  The fact that a non-U.S. person/entity might be interested in a farm in the Corn Belt is nothing new (citizens from outside the country currently own about 1.8% of agricultural land here – with Canadians comprising 40% of this group).  But based upon the number of calls/emails/questions we’ve received the past several months, it appears that the demand for a parcel of Midwest farmland from people living outside this country has increased dramatically.

Unbeknownst to some, it is possible for aliens to buy and own land in the Midwest but there are certain restrictions.  The federal government has regulations, and eight states (IA, MO, WI, NE, OK, SD, MN, ND)  have their own rules that must be closely followed.  The University of Nebraska has recently released a publication that provides an overview of the laws in that state (Nebraska Restrictions on Foreign Land Ownership) that can be easily found and downloaded from their Agricultural Economics web site. Note that some of the statutes in these states can seem slightly arcane… in some instances even a partnership or corporation in IL is considered “foreign” and is limited on how much they can own.

While I personally don’t anticipate foreign buyers having a big impact on land values in the Corn Belt, I do know that there are a lot of them asking questions.  Some of them have been discouraged by the government regulations, and some don’t understand how difficult it is to buy land at the present due to its limited supply (you want to buy 15,000 acres of Class “A” soils in Central IL in the next 12 months?… good luck with that!).  Alien owners also have to factor currency fluctuations into their ownership equation – something a U.S. buyer typically never has to consider.  So even though buying a Corn Belt farm might be a dream for many foreigners, sometimes it’s just not a practical thing to do.

Underlying Facts Supporting Farmland Prices

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

I recently attended the annual Land Investment Expo in Des Moines, Iowa and listened to an interesting presentation by Jim Knuth, Senior Vice President of Farm Credit Services.   Because it has so many local lending offices, Farm Credit has the ability to collect and analyze an incredible amount of land sale data.  The discussion included some general information, e.g., land values in IA have increased 34% the past 12 months, along with some more obscure (though important) statistics, some of which may explain how we’ve arrived at these current price levels. To wit…

1. In 2006, there were 6207 real estate sales in the territory serviced by the Farm Credit Services of America district (IA, SD, WY, NE).  In 2011, the number dropped to 4434 sales, confirming that there is a lot less land available to buy.

2.  In 2009, the debt to asset ratio for district borrowers was 35%.  In 2011, the ratio actually dropped to 34% despite higher land prices.  In addition, the loan to collateral value over the same period dropped from 54% to 48%. This confirms that the balance sheets for farmers continue to improve.

3.  In 2008, farmers purchased 82% of the IA farms that closed.  This number dropped to 73% in 2011, thus indicating that investors are continuing to purchase land despite the higher prices.

4.  In 2009, 29% of the land sold at public auction while in 2011 this percentage increased to 50%.  Not coincidentally, most of the record sale prices have occurred at auction, as there are a number of aggressive buyers in the market looking to add to their land holdings.

I look at the underlying land issues listed above, and am more convinced that this rapid increase in farmland values has been driven by profits and not speculation.  At some point, prices will stabilize and there may be a period where the market experiences a short-term correction.  I just can’t buy into the “bubble is ready to burst at anytime” scenario that a few economists are still predicting.

Runaway Land Prices Rational?

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

As mentioned in a previous blog, last month the Chicago Federal Reserve Bank hosted a farm real estate conference.  This gathering was the culmination and presentation of a year’s worth of research by the FDIC, the Chicago Fed, the Farm Credit Administration, and various other regulators.  These agencies wanted to determine if the steep run-up in land prices really was a bubble ready to pop, as some have suggested, or simply the result of market forces at work. Their findings were neatly summarized in this article by Marcia Zarley Taylor, Runaway Land Prices Rational, Regulators Now Say, originally published on the DTN website, and then republished on the KFGO radio website – www.kfgo.com.

In a nutshell, the experts confirmed what many of us have been saying for quite some time – current land values are not a function of speculators manipulating the market in hopes of making a quick profit, or buyers taking on excessive risk by heavily leveraging their purchases (a.k.a. the U.S. housing market).  Instead, values have been driven to their lofty heights by a combination of record net farm income and record low interest rates.  Yes, profits and cash flow have been the catalysts for higher land prices… a stark contrast from the market 30 years ago.

Since the fall of 2006, when the demand for land really began to pick up, one group I think that has been under-appreciated, yet a true stabilizing force in the market, is the ag bankers.  They have kept a close eye on the farm financial situation and provided the necessary capital for farmers/investors to complete land purchases, but only when these borrowers had enough of a down payment so that the risk was minimized.  Hopefully, they’ll continue to keep their lending standards high in the future and act as the brake to slow any reckless behavior.  Now, can you tell me more about that 78 acres that sold in NW Iowa last week for $20,000 per acre?

More Analysis of the Farmland Market

Friday, November 25th, 2011

On November 15th, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago hosted a conference entitled “Rising Farmland Values – Causes and Cautions”.  A series of prominent economists, professors, lenders, and other industry professionals were invited to offer their view of the current state of the farmland marketplace in the Midwest.  Many of the  presentations can be found and downloaded here (Chicago Fed Ag Conference) by clicking on the “Agenda” tab.

I’m the first to admit that there are several different methods for discussing and analyzing the land value issue. Some experts have taken reams of historical data and neatly summarized the whole story in a series of charts and graphs.  Others have taken the more simplified approach of simply talking with land buyers and land sellers to see what’s been motivating their behavior.  When looking at the issue from this angle, it appears the biggest driver in ag land values has been the increase in farm income.  No doubt there are other forces at play, e.g., the risk/return of alternative investments, etc., but it still boils down to the fact that farmers have been making more money and they’ve invested a large part of their profits into new land purchases (or higher rents, thus stabilizing the returns to investors).

The future direction of land values is uncertain (though I personally feel that the rapid increase we’ve seen the past 5 years is going to level off) and I encourage all farmers and investors to continue reading and studying the issue closely.  But when you get to the point when your head is ready to explode from information overload, just remember the basics – if farmers are making money, land values will remain steady and/or move higher.  When they aren’t, especially for an extended period of time, then it’s time to get worried.

Pension Funds Still Heavily Invested in Farmland

Friday, October 21st, 2011

Pension funds investing in farmland is not a new trend.  They have long valued the steady income and long-term appreciation of the asset.  However, with farmland’s recent explosion into the mainstream as a “hot” investment, people have taken notice how heavily invested into agriculture pension and hedge funds really are.  A recent article posted on Financial Times (The Real Bull Market) takes a closer look at what is fueling the interest of these investors.  The main point that the article makes is that as world population grows, someone is going to have to grow the crops to feed the world.  Considering that US contains some of the productive and fertile land in the world, it stands to reason that investors would take long-term positions in US farmland.

This is not a new opinion.  We’ve seen numerous forecasters predicting that over the next 50 +/- years farmland would continue to be viewed a a desirable asset as the demand for food increases.  If it’s one thing that history has taught us, though, it is that nothing is a given.  For the short-term, meaning the next 12-18 months, farmland continues to appear to be a strong market.  However, the variables that help play into farm prices (commodities prices, interest rates, weather patterns, etc.) can change at any time and slow this market down considerably.  The buyers that are taking long positions, such as pension funds, have less risk than the buyers who are looking to buy a farm and flip it for a quick profit.  There are owners of vacant condos in Miami and Las Vegas than can tell you that the quick buck in real estate is sometimes easier said than done.