Posts Tagged ‘interest rates’

Cheap Money Keeps Getting Cheaper

Thursday, September 1st, 2011

Commodity prices are often cited as the biggest driver of farmland prices… and deservedly so.  Without $7.00 corn I doubt that we would see $10,000 land.  But let’s not ignore the other big dog in the room, i.e., interest rates.  A recent article by Linda H. Smith on dtnprogressivefarmer.com (Time to Reap Cheap Money) provides a good overview of the interest rate market. For example, in the four Corn Belt states served by Farm Credit Services of Mid-America, 20-year farm mortgages are running under 5%. This is a definite boon for those buying land at current prices, and a real opportunity for existing landowners to refinance their debt at lower rates.

Probably the biggest unknown at this stage is how long these low rates will last.  Some economists, notably Kansas State professor Allen Featherstone, believe that there will be a small uptick at some point – “Based on an analysis of Treasury yields, the market expects somewhat higher interest rates in the future; it expects inflation to rise, but only by about one percentage point”.  Another interesting insight from Featherstone – “When the financial crisis hit in October 2008, five-year Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) spiked to four percentage points over inflation. Now, it has collapsed below zero. In other words, traders are paying to hold the money.”

These low rates obviously help borrowers, but they also have drawn investor cash from C.D.s and bonds into the farmland market.  When you combine the current interest rate environment with record grain prices, the argument that farmland values are merely a speculative bubble ready to burst seems a bit absurd. In reality, both farmers and investors are buying land for solid economic reasons, not for speculative purposes.

2011 Farmland Outlook

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

As we’ve discussed on this blog numerous times, farmland values are a function of several different factors – interest rates, commodity prices, returns on alternative investments, government policies, etc.  Of all these variables, typically a large movement  in grain prices will have the most immediate impact on land prices. Landowners (both farmers and investors) can quickly determine that a $1.50 jump in corn prices (like we’ve seen in 2010) will lead to higher than anticipated income, which can be used to fund a farm purchase.  Conversely, a drop in corn prices (like we saw in the fall of 2008), make large capital purchases nearly impossible.  

Farm Journal magazine recently held a marketing rally where they invited several top commodity analysts to provide their outlook for 2011.  Their remarks (Even the Bears Are Bullish) have been summarized on the AgWeb.com website and as the title suggests, there is plenty of optimism looking forward into next year.  Numerous opportunities to lock in profitable grain prices are likely, though volatility will likely be high. 

Assuming the commodity professionals are correct, land prices next year should remain strong.  A good job marketing grain (assuming normal yields) will mean that farmers should again have enough excess income to purchase land if they so desire. Fortunately, this demand will be driven by excess profits and not just mere speculation. And as long as there is enough cash flow to make the land payment, then a farm purchase will remain an excellent long term investment.

The Case for Current Farmland Prices

Friday, October 29th, 2010

With the recent run-up in commodity prices, it’s safe to say that in the next few months farmland prices will surpass the record levels of 2008 and continue moving higher.  For many, the next question is… “are prices too high?” As discussed in last week’s blog, current FDIC Chairwoman Sheila Blair believes the answer is “yes”.  In fact, she warns that farmland may be the next investment bubble to burst.  And there are others in the industry that agree with her…but not all.

University of Illinois Professor Gary Schnitkey recently posted an article on the University of Illinois “farmdoc” web site (FARMLAND PRICE OUTLOOK: ARE FARMLAND PRICES TOO HIGH RELATIVE TO RETURNS AND INTEREST RATES?) that makes a case that current prices are actually in-line with historical capitalized returns that take into account interest rates, cash rental rates, and other factors.  He does admit, however, that a significant increase in interest rates, or a significant decrease in commodity prices (the main component in determining cash rent) could bring a sudden halt to the party. 

I personally don’t think that the Federal Reserve is inclined at the present to start raising interest rates while the general economy is stagnant.  Trying to predict grain prices is a bit more tenuous. It only takes one good widespread weather year to create a crop surplus.  Most importantly though, is a factor that the supposed experts typically fail to account for (though it is hard to quantify) – the emotional attachment to owning a piece of land.  Unlike the equities market, when a person is ready to sell, sell, sell when his individual stock or fund has a 20 % correction, people that own a farm generally have the mindset of hold, hold, hold regardless of price trends.  They own land because they like it, not because they hope to reap a huge financial windfall.  (Note – some may argue that institutional investors are driven solely by the bottom line… and they are.  But they make up such a small percentage of the overall market that their actions really don’t have a huge long-term impact.) 

In summary, while both Chairwoman Blair and Professor Schnitkey create interesting arguments, I think the “love of the land” may be the biggest buffer against a land price collapse.

New Farmland Report Out!

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago just released the May issue of their Agricultural Letter.  This publication focuses on farmland values and agricultural credit conditions across the Midwest.  The Fed gathers their information by surveying 215 bankers across the region and while the letter does a great job of discussing general trends in the agricultural community, keep in mind that specific “micro” areas, e.g., counties, townships, etc. may differ from state averages.

So what did we learn in the May issue?  As expected, farmland values increased in the first quarter of 2010, with the “I” states (Indiana, Illinois, Iowa) leading the way.  In addition, values in these areas were up from 4 – 8% over the same period last year.  Interest rates for farm loans in the first quarter of this year were lower than anytime during the past 24 months.  And finally, the letter also had some interesting articles that discussed the Price-to-Earnings ratio for farmland, loan repayment rates, and the outlook for land prices for the second quarter (85% thought that they would remain unchanged).

 If you’re truly interested in following agricultural trends in the Corn Belt, I would suggest subscribing to this publication (or continue reading our blog in the future!).  It’s one government report that I find both interesting and informative.

What Can Bring Down Farmland Values?

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

While we have definitely seen certain sectors of the farmland real estate industry hit hard by the tough economic times we are in (see: Recreational Land), the demand for high-quality Midwest row-crop land appears to be as strong as ever.  Sales in East-Central Illinois continue to be in the $6,000 – $7,000 per acre range and there have been sales in Western Illinois for over $8,000 per acre.  However, with any market, there are going to be ebbs and flows.  A recent article by DTN/Progressive Farmer analyzes a few factors hat could negatively affect farmland values in the future.  Read the full article – What Could Burst Land’s Bubble?

The author looks at 2 possible factors – Multiple consecutive years of low farm income and increasing interest rates.  If a situation were to occur, whether it be a natural disaster, a decrease in demand for corn based products (e.g. Ethanol or high-fructose corn syrup), or simply the fear of the unknown, where commodity prices languished at low levels for many years, this would eventually negatively affect land prices.  At lower commodities prices, farmers will not be able to continue to pay at the same levels of rent payments.  With lower rent payments, the landlord’s return on his/her property is going to be lower, which will finally affect the farm ’s value.

The situation that the author lays out with regards to interest rates is that if interest rates increase, credit may become harder for some farmer-landowners to acquire all the necessary credit to continue their operation.

While neither of these situations appears very likely today, it is always wise to seek out possible weak points in the market so that we as investors can be prepared as best as we can.

What are your thoughts on where the farmland market currently is and where it may be headed?