Posts Tagged ‘’

Notes From the Countryside

Tuesday, June 28th, 2011

Last week we conducted an auction of 81 acres in Vermilion County, IL, about half way between Champaign and Danville.  There was nothing magical about the property – 90% tillable with good (but not great) soils, and an acre carved out for a cell phone tower.  Local farmers were the most active bidders and the hammer dropped at $615,000 or $8,471 per tillable acre.  This price was obviously a long way from some of the $12,000 per acre sales we’ve been hearing throughout the Midwest, but most of these high sales are in strong areas, from both a soil type perspective and a “farmer wealth” perspective.

Sale price aside, we were able to talk to several lenders and land buyers during the marketing of our auction and found several of their comments quite telling, including:

Lender 1 – “You would be surprised to learn how many farmers have over $500,000 in the bank, just waiting for a farm to come for sale in their area.”

Lender 2 – “Farmers came in this spring to set up their operating lines of credit this spring, just like normal.  The surprise is how many that have not borrowed any money thus far and it’s already the end of June!”

Broker 1 – “There are going to be a lot more tracts coming on the market in the near future.  Landowners are hearing about these high prices and are ready to take advantage of them.”

These comments confirm a couple of things that I have been thinking for some time – A. Farmers are going to continue to be quite aggressive land buyers.  They have cash in the bank and the crop prospects for 2011 look quite good at the present; and B. There will likely be more tracts for sale this fall.  Some of this new supply may be investors taking profits, but a lot may be heirs and beneficiaries deciding that the time to take the money and run is now here.  As an offshoot of this thought – I also anticipate more “no-sales” this fall, not because the price isn’t in line with the market, but more because expectations are too high.  As we saw in Vermilion County, not all farms are worth $12,000 per acre.

Keeping Farm Lending In Check

Thursday, April 21st, 2011

We are currently in the middle of a very bullish farmland market. Land sales in many areas across the Midwest are breaking records with each new auction.  The question is – What can slow down this ride that we are on?  There are many factors at play, but one key component is interest rates for farm loans and overall credit in the farm industry.  A recent Reuters article (U.S. Farmland Boom May Carry Long-Term Risk: FDIC) takes a look at ag lending practices and how changes may affect farming operations and the land market.

One important point the article mentions is that the FDIC does not see a problem at the current time with lending in agriculture.  One reason for this is that ag lenders and borrowers have long memories and have not forgotten the market crash in the early 1980’s, which was partly caused by many bad loans being given to borrowers with not enough equity to support the loans they received.  Low interest rates are definitely a major factor in helping fuel the market we are currently in.  That being said, most buyers that we have worked with are laying out significant amounts of cash as part of farm purchases.  While loans are still involved in most cases, buyers are avoiding putting themselves into highly leveraged situations that many farm owners found themselves in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s.

The article also offers up that lending institutions are doing their homework before handing out a loan.  They are requiring more money down and keeping repayment schedules strict to attempt to minimize bad loans.  The article also states that lenders have become more comfortable with simply turning down business that they feel would put their company in a bad position.

While it is possible to find support to both sides of the argument of if the farmland market is a bubble ready to burst, I think that the continued practicing of conservative lending practices, coupled with the sensibility of buyers to not over extend themselves, will help keep the farmland market strong.

The Possible Farmland Bubble

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

FDIC chairman Sheila Blair sparked some discussion earlier this week when she warned that farmland could be the next bubble to burst, following the residential real estate market and the stock market (Farmweeknow – FDIC chair warns of possible farmland bubble).  While I agree with Ms. Blair’s comment that an eye should be kept on the market, that is something any savvy investor would do in any economic environment.  I disagree with Ms. Blair that the farmland market is being set-up for the same downturn it experienced in the early 1980’s.  First, the amount of farm purchases being fully leveraged in the early 1980’s was much more significant than in today’s market.  Second, the fact that agricultural lenders and buyers went through the tough times 30 years ago caused the ag credit lending system to re-evaluate and correct itself…something residential lenders are now going through.  Finally, buyers are by and large still seeing favorable returns from the purchase of agriculture properties.

With worldwide demand for US produce remaining strong, prices for commodities will remain strong, which will continue to drive the farmland market.  A shift in demand, an increase in interest rates, years of consecutive poor yields and other variables could have a definite negative impact on the farmland market in the future.  However, simply saying, “The bubble burst in the 80’s and it is the farmland market’s turn again” is not enough evidence for me.

Taking Advantage of Low Interest Rates

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

I am sure you have heard the popular buzz word that has been circulating recently – Refinance.  While the majority of the news you have read relating to mortgage refinancing probably relates to home mortgages, the farm loan market is equally as active in many areas.  A recent article posted by DTN and 1st Farm Credit Services (Interest Rate’s Gold Rush) takes a look at some fixed-rate loans at various Farm Credit offices around the Midwest.  What they are seeing are rates that have not been at this low of a level since the 1950’s.  For some farmers, refinancing is a way to lower their monthly payments by staying in a longer term mortgage, but  dropping down to a lower interest rate.  Other borrowers are choosing to shorten the term of their loan and pay off the the debt sooner, and in a lot of cases create new payments that are not significantly different than their previous payments on the longer-term note because of the significant drop in rates.

The biggest difference between refinancing an ag loan as opposed to a residential loan, is the refinancing costs.  While it may cost  a few thousand dollars to refinance a home mortgage,  the article states that Farm Credit Services of Mid-America charges $350 to change the loan terms.  By taking away one of the biggest barriers to the refinancing process, the door is open for many ag borrowers to negotiate more favorable terms.

As the seasons change and we move into fall, the time when farm sales begin to pick up steam, the availability of low interest rates will give buyers more options.  If the farmland continues its recent tend of tight inventory, and buyers remain active, having low interest rates added into the mix could make for an interesting fall.

More Facts on Organic Agriculture

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

In previous articles and blogs, we have discussed the growth of the organic food market.  In certain parts of the country, this segment of agriculture has expanded rapidly.  A recent article in Amber Waves, Organic Farmers Faces Issues and Opportunities, provides more details of the size and scope of this industry. 

As can be expected, organic farming varies significantly across the different types of crops.  For example, nearly 9% of all U.S. berries are produced organically, while only 0.2% of all corn is.  Interestingly, the demand for certain organic products is so great that we’re now importing some of these goods to meet the needs.  This is in addition to the imports of organic crops not typically grown here like tea, cocoa, and coffee.

Unfortunately, the organic industry still faces many challenges.  One of the biggest at the present is the public confusion from other food labels such as “locally grown”.  The two methods should complement, not compete, with each other.  The locally grown label simply tells people where the product is grown, not how as in the case of organic farming.

I believe that the continued demand for organic products and the price premiums they command will ultimately lead to a price premium for land that has met the certification criteria.  The market has been so small in the past that at the present almost no one (including most appraisers) knows what that premium to a non-certified farm might be.  That said, I’m convinced that within 5 – 10 years there will be enough sale data to prove what we inherently know – a specialized asset will ultimately command a premium price in the market place.