Archive for December, 2010

2011 Farmland Outlook

Wednesday, December 29th, 2010

As we’ve discussed on this blog numerous times, farmland values are a function of several different factors – interest rates, commodity prices, returns on alternative investments, government policies, etc.  Of all these variables, typically a large movement  in grain prices will have the most immediate impact on land prices. Landowners (both farmers and investors) can quickly determine that a $1.50 jump in corn prices (like we’ve seen in 2010) will lead to higher than anticipated income, which can be used to fund a farm purchase.  Conversely, a drop in corn prices (like we saw in the fall of 2008), make large capital purchases nearly impossible.  

Farm Journal magazine recently held a marketing rally where they invited several top commodity analysts to provide their outlook for 2011.  Their remarks (Even the Bears Are Bullish) have been summarized on the AgWeb.com website and as the title suggests, there is plenty of optimism looking forward into next year.  Numerous opportunities to lock in profitable grain prices are likely, though volatility will likely be high. 

Assuming the commodity professionals are correct, land prices next year should remain strong.  A good job marketing grain (assuming normal yields) will mean that farmers should again have enough excess income to purchase land if they so desire. Fortunately, this demand will be driven by excess profits and not just mere speculation. And as long as there is enough cash flow to make the land payment, then a farm purchase will remain an excellent long term investment.

Dealing With Cash Rents

Thursday, December 16th, 2010

It seems that no matter where you are at, cash rent numbers are always a moving target.  Because many landlord-tenant contracts are negotiated year-to-year, the rent usually fluctuates with how good or bad the tenant did the previous year.  If the farmer had a good year in the previous year, and the rent goes up for the next year and he/she has a bad year, that farmer is going to feel the pinch.  Conversely, if the landlord decides to lower the cash rent for a farmer after a poor year, and the farmer pulls in a bumper crop and takes advantage of high commodities prices and timely grain marketing, the farmer could be pulling in a nice profit.  When leases are adjusted to reflect the previous year there is always going to be inefficiencies.

While commodities prices have fluctuated fairly widely the last few years, the cash rent trend has continued to head upward…which is an obvious concern to those writing the cash rent checks twice a year.   A recent article posted on The Farm Gate (University of Illinois) discusses some interesting numbers regarding cash rents (Cash Rent: How Fast & Furious Is It Rising?).  The author points out some interesting numbers, such as that while cash rents have risen by 70% since 1990, non-land production costs and income from crops has almost doubled.  Also, his research points out that over the same time span cash rent portion of the overall budget has declined for many producers.

What kind of trends have you seen in your area?  Are incomes staying up with cash rents?

The 2012 Farm Bill

Monday, December 13th, 2010

Though it still seems a long way off, discussions on the new farm bill are already under way.  Jennifer Stewart and Roman Keeney at Purdue University recently wrote an interesting article that highlights what the major issues/discussions/arguments might be: (Watch Three B’s in the 2012 Farm Bill).  

The first “B” is Brazil.  In 2009, the World Trade Organization (W.T.O.) allowed Brazil to impose sanctions against the U.S. arguing that American cotton subsidies were illegal under W.T.O. rules.  Changes must be made in the 2012 farm bill so that the U.S. is in compliance with global trade rules.  While the total dollars involved may not be significant, the principle issue will be as changes may have to be made to other program crops in order to avoid possible sanctions later.

The second “B” is the federal Budget.  As the elections in November reflected, people in this country are tired of government overspending.  The campaign theme of many of the newly elected senators and representatives was reducing the federal deficit and all programs are potentially on the chopping block. And since the farm part of the U.S. economy has been one of the few profitable sectors the past several months, many politicians will be taking a hard look at the programs closely related to agriculture.

The final “B” is baseline spending. Though a part of the overall budget process, this concept would hopefully allow the farm bill to move quickly through the house without being subjected to larger reform budget procedures.  The goal is to hold spending in the new bill close to previous levels, thus avoiding an extended discussion on the costs and benefits of each the programs.  Unfortunately, this may be much more difficult to achieve than is hoped.

Yes, it does seem like only yesterday when Midwestern farmers were trying to understand the nuances of the ACRE program passed in the last farm bill.  One can only imagine what surprises Congress may have in store for the next go-around as the give-and-take world of politics will likely determine the final outcome.

Positive End of Year Outlook for US Farmers

Friday, December 3rd, 2010

While many sectors of the economy are still languishing, the US farm economy is seeing positive movement in many areas.  A recent article in Bloomberg (Farm Economy Heading for Record Driving Surge in U.S. Cropland) takes a look at the factors driving the farm economy and what they see happening in the future.  Current commodities stocks are being depleted because of poor harvests in Canada and Europe.  This dwindling supply has been the main factor in driving commodities prices to their current strong levels.  Those farmers that took advantage of higher corn and bean prices this fall are using those additional funds to add to their farming operations, and in many cases purchase more farmland.  Many areas are seeing farm prices pushed back up to the high prices that were experienced in late 2007-early 2008.  One caveat to this surge that we have noticed this fall is that farms that have some blemishes on them are not seeing the added value that more “easy to farm”  properties are.  By blemishes, I mean farms that have significant non-tillable acres/timber, waterways/terraces, odd-shaped properties, etc.  While there is still a demand for less than ideal farms, land owners should  recognize that just because there have been some sky-high sale prices in their region, that doesn’t automatically make every property in the area worth the same value.