Archive for February, 2010

THE EVOLUTION OF THE FARM LEASE

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

One of the most interesting changes I’ve seen since I’ve been involved with Illinois and Indiana farmland involves the farm lease.  Thirty years ago, the vast majority of the farm rental arrangements were based upon a sharing of the crop and the crop expenses.  Fifteen years ago, the cash rent lease became more prevalent, as farmers were willing to assume more risk in their operations.  This type of agreement appealed to many absentee investors as they no longer had to write checks for crop expenses or worry about marketing their grain, plus they knew exactly how much they were to receive each year.

The volatility we’ve seen in the grain markets the past 3 years is creating the need for another type of lease – the flex lease.  This lease type is not new – there have been variations of it around for several years.  Essentially the flex lease tries to incorporate the aspect of the cash lease that landlords found appealing (no expense checks to write and a guaranteed payment amount) with the revenue sharing aspect of the crop share lease (when grain prices go up or when yields are exceptional, the rent can go up).  All this is accomplished by setting a floor rent that the farmer is willing to pay for the land, and then incorporating a formula that calculates a bonus based upon crop prices, actual yields, or both.  Sometimes the formula is simple, and sometimes it’s quite complex.  A recent article (Creating A Flexible Farm Cash Rent Lease) written by two Kansas State University Agricultural professors details the process that many farmers and investors are going through to try and establish an agreement that is fair, given the changing conditions in farming.

I’m confident that in the not too distant future we will see leases for farmland properties evolving again.  If you have any thoughts regarding this issue, please email them to loranda@loranda.com

THE DEMAND FOR FARMLAND

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010
As we have discussed here in previous entries, farm values van vary widely across the Midwest, across states & counties, and even across townships.  160 tillable acres in east-central Illinois is typically worth more per acre than 160 tillable acres in southern Illinois.  Obviously, the biggest difference between these 2 regions is soil types, which determines how productive the farm will be and how many dollars can be pulled from it.  However, other factors such as weather patterns, local buyer strength, etc. also play roles in determining the value of a property.

While farmland buyers have always placed a premium on Class A farms, the past few years we have seen this premium become even greater.  When looking at farmland value trends across a region, it is important to remember that there are many micro-markets inside these regions.  While the land prices in a region may appear to be holding steady, a closer look may reveal that the poorer farms have decreased in value while the larger, more productive farms have increased in value.

A recent article in the Sioux City Journal describes just this scenario, except in Iowa instead of Illinois.  The article (here) discusses some recent land sales in Iowa as well as trends in various counties.  According to the author, some counties in Iowa experienced gains in values as high as 4+% in the last year, while other counties saw declines in value of more than 6%.

So when you are trying to get a handle on what this market is doing, and what your farm may be worth, it is important to look at the sales in your immediate area.  That will give you a reasonably good idea of what to expect out of your property.

Do you have any thoughts on the premiums being placed on the top farms?  Curious as to what farmland values are doing in your specific area?  Feel free to email me at eric@loranda.com.

Source: Sioux City Journal

NO 2010 ESTATE TAX – HEARTBURN OR PARTY TIME?

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

You’ve no doubt seen that a lot of attention has been paid to the recent Congressional discussions focused on health care, unemployment, and job creation.  However, a topic you may not have seen much about is the fact there is no estate tax on death during 2010!  No doubt, the “management” of death for individuals and families of wealth has been an important one for a great many years.  In 2009, for example, individual estates had an exemption of $3.5 million in value from estate taxes.  And for those who inherited property in 2009, the assets that they received were given preferential tax basis treatment with the automatic “step-up” in tax basis – essentially a forgiving of the capital gain that had occurred during the life of the party who passed the asset to their beneficiary.  So with no limit on the size of estates in 2010, and no tax, this must be a great deal, right?

Not so fast.  As Marcia Zarley Taylor, DTN Executive Editor, recently wrote, the expiration of the previous tax law is causing some unintended consequences – and major heartburn for tax and estate planning specialists.  To read the article, click here.  If nothing is done about this issue by Congress in 2010, the estate tax exemption in 2011 will revert back to $1 million in value – from an unlimited dollar value in 2010.  And as Ms. Taylor implies, it doesn’t take too many assets in today’s world to race through the $1 million in value exemption.  That said, many who thought they were insulated/safe from estate taxes could be caught in the crosshairs in 2011.  In addition, while the size of estates is unlimited from estate taxes in 2010, the preferential “step-up” in basis tax treatment is no longer in play – so beneficiaries have a lot more to think about, and do, if they plan to sell capital assets that they inherit in 2010, as capital gains could be significant.  And you thought the grain markets were suspect to volatile swings!  It seems that tax and estate planning circles always assumed that Congress would act to ensure some consistency at the expiration of this part of tax law – but so far it appears little has been done.

So what do you think – should Congress do anything moving forward concerning the tax treatment for estates?  What do you think their inaction could do to the land market?  E-mail me at doug@loranda.com with your thoughts.

Source: www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com

THE 2011 FEDERAL BUDGET AND ITS IMPACT ON AGRICULTURE

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

The Obama Administration just released its proposed federal budget for the 2011 fiscal year starting October 1.  While the details are still being analyzed, the most staggering figure is the $3.8 trillion in total spending.  This includes an increase for programs that will help stimulate job growth; a freeze on discretionary spending for the next 3 years (which includes many USDA programs); an elimination of many tax preferences for industry; and a myriad of new taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations.

In the past, farm programs were often considered untouchable.  With government deficits now running rampant, this may be the year when certain USDA programs are scaled back or eliminated altogether.  A quick summary of what may lay ahead for agricultural can be found on the University of Illinois’ “The Farm Gate” website here: (USDA’s New Budget Proposal) .

I think the average American is beginning to realize that unbridled government spending has severe long-term implications.  Hopefully, the federal government will heed the call to quit spending money they don’t have.

Please share your thoughts by emailing us at: loranda@loranda.com