Archive for December, 2009

A COMMENT ON AGRICULTURAL INTEREST RATES

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

If you’ve recently borrowed money to buy a home, you know that interest rates remain near all-time historic lows (e.g., 5% for a 30-year mortgage!).  Some people not involved in the agricultural sector may also assume that ag lending rates are at or near those same remarkably cheap levels.  However, the facts show that this is not the case at the current time.

DTN Progressive Farmer recently published a snapshot of agricultural lending rates, provided to them by Farm Credit Services of Mid-America.  To see the report of recent interest rates charged for both real estate and operating capital, click here.

As you will see, long-term (e.g., 10+ years) money borrowed for an agricultural real estate mortgage has recently been more than 30% more expensive than that for a conventional home mortgage.  Why?  The answer stems from our government’s support for and purchase of more than a trillion dollars in housing-related mortgage backed securities during 2009 and into 2010 (to read more about the Fed’s actions, click here).  The financial support given to support the troubled housing market does not appear to be prevalent in the ag sector.

That said, ag sector lending rates – just like those for home mortgages – do remain near historic lows.  However, that may change.  In summation of a conversation I recently had with an ag lender, “rates only have one way to go, and that is up.”  And as the Federal Reserve attempts to feather its way out of providing tremendous support for the U.S. housing market in the next year and beyond, it will be interesting to watch the spread differences between home rates and those for ag loans.

What’s your opinion – should the government continue to support the U.S. housing market?  If so, is the ag sector being short-changed?  Send me an e-mail at doug@loranda.com to let me know your thoughts.

THE FUTURE OF THE CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

This past fall, the USDA sought public comment on the future of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) – what changes should be made in terms of eligibility, payment rates, etc.  That got me wondering about the history of the program (it seems like it’s been around for a long time), so I checked Wikipedia and came up with the following…

The program originally began in the 1950’s as the conservation branch of the Soil Bank Program which was enacted by the Agriculture Act of 1954.  The theory behind the branch of the Soil Bank Program was to focus on lands that were at high risk of erosion, remove them from agricultural production, and establish native or alternative vegetative cover in an effort to counteract actual or potential erosion.  This was considered by proponents to be beneficial to agriculture generally, by lessening the effects of erosion.  Originally the program called for three-year contracts in which the government would pay for land improvements that increased soil, water, forestry, or wildlife quality if the farmer would agree not to harvest or graze contracted land.

Although the roots of the program were established in the 1950’s, advocates did not start pushing the program heavily until the 1980’s, in response to more prevalent practices in the 1970’s whereby farmers increasingly began to cultivate “fence row to fence row”, and remove native habitat and vegetative stands from the fields, which was perceived as having detrimental effects on soil, water, and habitat quality. Many programs would be established in the 1980’s to address these issues.

With most government programs, the costs begin to escalate over the years and it evolves into something that it was never intended for.  Yet personally, I feel that CRP has accomplished many of its original goals – it’s taken fragile land out of production that probably never should have been tilled in the first place, and it’s improved wildlife habitat.  In addition, having acres out of production mean fewer bushels to sell and higher crop prices (good for the grain farmer, not so much for livestock producers).  Farm Journal has a nice article this month that frames the debate (Changes Loom for CRP).

Have your own thoughts regarding the Conservation Reserve Program?  Send them to loranda@loranda.com.

DECEMBER NEWSLETTER

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009
This week we will be sending out the December edition of our newsletter, Land Facts.  We cover many different topics in this year-end edition including:

  • The state of the farmland market over the course of this past year and where we may be headed in the future
  • A quick look at the recreational land market and its status
  • The historical performance of the Illinois farmland market
  • A look at the decrease in the number of recent farm sales and what may be causing this decrease.

If you would like to view an electronic version of the December Land Facts, click here.

If you are not already on our mail list to receive a hard copy directly to your mailbox, and would like to be added, please email us at eric@loranda.com.

Do you have any thoughts on any of the articles contained in the newsletter?  We would love to hear them.  Send us an email at eric@loranda.com.

FARM AUCTION RESULTS

Friday, December 11th, 2009

On Thursday, December 10th, we conducted an auction of 83 +/- acres in southwestern McDonough County, IL.  The property was offered in 2 tracts and presented bidders with both tillable farmland and woodlands.  Tract 1 featured approximately 30.9 tillable acres of Class B/C soils; Tract 2 featured approximately 38 tillable acres situated in 3 tillable fields.  Active bidding was present on both individual tracts, and the whole farm.  Ultimately, the whole farm bidder prevailed.  The final sale results were:

Tract 1 + 2 (83.55 Acres) – $265,000 or $3,171.75 per acre.

To download more details from the auction, click here.

FARM AUCTION RESULTS

Monday, December 7th, 2009

This previous Friday, December 4th, we conducted an auction of 217 +/- acres in southern LaSalle County, IL.  The property was offered in 2 tracts and presented bidders with tillable farmland, pasture/woodlands, and a creek.  The final sale results were:

Tract 1 (93.08 Acres) – $390,000 or $4,189.94 per acre; B/C Soils; FSA considered this tract to be mostly tillable land, although 22 acres had been enrolled in CRP previously and were not in production at the present time;

Tract 2 (124.69 Acres) – $590,000 or $4,731.73 per acre; A/B/C Soils; 69% Tillable, with the balance in pasture/woodlands, and divided by a creek.

The overall price for the entire 217.77 acres was $980,000, or $4,500.16 per acre.

Click here to download more details from the auction.